Peer Assessment Question 1a Portfolio
Peer Assessment Question 1a Portfolio
Skill Concept/question:
Research & Planning essay response –
How have you developed from AS to A2, with research & planning?
|
Student
name: Cole Madondo
MEG: C Working at Grade: B
|
List examples of RMT referenced:
1.
Prelim
2.
AS – Research & Planning
3.
AS - Magazine
4.
A2 – Research & Planning
5.
A2 – Film Trailer
|
List
terminology words:
Creativity
Mise-En-Scene
Typography
Target
Audience
Typical
Atypical
Conventions
|
Level
|
Description
|
Ref no
|
Grade
|
Agree?
|
Level
1:
|
Outlines,
defines or describes conventions/digital
technology/research & planning/post production with little reference
to own production, and is under 250 words (1 side handwritten A4)
|
U
|
Yes
|
|
Level
2 lower:
|
Introduces
and describes 2-3 relevant examples of their work across the 2 years using
some correct terminology
|
E
|
Yes
|
|
Level
2 mid:
|
Provides
some examples but inconsistently and/or lacks comparison
|
E/D-
|
Yes
|
|
Level
2 higher:
|
Describes
the development of relevant skills using 3 examples across the 2 years and gives
some comments on why they are conventions/their purpose/influence on
creativity with some reference to own production
|
D
|
Yes
|
|
Level
3 lower:
|
The
essay uses paragraphs and full sentences, there are minimal errors in grammar
or spelling and addresses the question (ie Use, challenge, develop/influence
on creativity/understanding of conventions) and refers to examples of RMT
|
C-
|
Yes
|
|
Level
3 lower:
|
Gives
specific textual examples from own production (ie colours) and applies to examples
of RMT. Gives some explanation of purpose/use of/function/influence on
|
C
|
Yes
|
|
Level
3 mid:
|
Explains
critically how the skill is relevant to their own production and how this
skill has developed over the 2 years to address the question
|
C/B-
|
Yes
|
|
Level
3 higher:
|
Compares
a 4-5 key examples from significant productions with RMT to explain how their
skills and level of understanding has improved
|
B
|
Yes
|
|
Level
3 higher:
|
Compares
a 4-5 key examples from significant productions with RMT to explain how their
skills and level of understanding has improved to show progression
|
B+
|
No
|
Level
4:
|
Critically
evaluates the extent that they have progressed over the 2 years with 4-5 key
examples, fully explaining the significance on their production work and
referring to influences of RMT/Technologies etc. May bring in ideas of
Post-modernism
|
A-
|
No
|
|
Level
4:
|
Confidently
justifies argument with detailed textual examples from the production and
conventions of existing media/creative possibilities that technologies
creates. May justify themselves as a Post-modern practitioner
|
A
|
No
|
|
Level
4:
|
There
are no or minimal grammatical or spelling errors and terminology is used
confidently, regularly and correctly
|
A+
|
No
|
What
are the 3 priority targets to secure the grade or move to a higher level
|
|
1. Explanation,
analysis, argument
|
Explain and
provide analytical points whilst using the PEA structure.
|
2. Use
of examples
|
Use real
examples, and use them more often, instead of just using two or less. Then
compare those examples with how I improved from AS to A2.
|
3. Use
of terminology
|
Include more
terminology throughout the essay.
|
Comments
Post a Comment